It's true. For as long as I can remember, I've been someone who has delighted in that little (32" widescreen, so little by today's standards) box in the corner of the room. I cut my teeth in the late '60s on Jackson Five cartoons, Basil Brush, Pinky and Perky and, naturally, Doctor Who. My disablity meant that toddling/running about the house causing havoc was out of the question. I played, I had parents who loved and nurtured me, I had playmates and family. But I had my telly, too, and I loved it.
Even then, however, my life had balance -- as I believe it has today. I loved music and quickly learned that books could offer a richer, more personal version of what television gave me. I liked stories, whatever form they took (most of my favourite songs have a narrative to them), and I understood on some level that individual stories served different purposes -- this one was just for "fun" and this one was intended to "teach" me something. Television taught me many things (back in the day of three channels, it wasn't unusual to find Little Me watching Open University programmes), but, primarily, it was and still is about entertainment, for me, at least.
More to the point, it was and is about convenient escapism.
It's all too easy to condemn this ubiquitous medium as low-brow -- as a mind-numbing, virus-like disease turning our society into something less than it should be with its reality shows and banal soaps, and, yes, there is much that I hate about current programming... but does it deserve this? I tend to think not.
Good drama, debate, documentaries by the boat-load, more sport than you can shake a javelin at... and, of course, all of this will get even better once the BBC starts producing my work ;-) Something for everyone.
I do, however, think it is capable of far greater things -- in the realm of drama, in particular -- and this is something I may return to in a future post.
If there's nothing good on telly.